BST — Beam Solver Tool ← Slabs binder

The BST binders · Slabs binder · The slab — step by step · updated 27.9.2026

Equivalent spanL0 = c · L — and the largest governs

Every span gets a coefficient c according to the scheme type and its place in it: L0 = c · L

  • Continuous c less than 1 (0.6–0.9)
  • Single c = 1
  • Cantilever c = 2.2

L0(max) — the largest of all the slab's spans — is what sets the thickness.

  1. 01

    Why do we need an 'equivalent' span? (30 seconds)

    • The thickness is set by the deflection — how much the slab sags (bends downward) at mid-span.
    • A continuous span sags less than a single span: the inner support 'holds' it → c less than 1.
    • A cantilever sags much more — it has a support on one side only → c = 2.2.
    • L0 translates every span into 'the length of a single span that would sag the same' — and then they can be compared.
  2. 02

    The coefficient table — by scheme type

    The coefficients follow the order of the spans in the drawing — from the left span to the right · orange = cantilever
    SchemeDrawingc
    2 supports11
    3 supports0.80.80.8 · 0.8
    4 supports0.80.60.80.8 · 0.6 · 0.8
    2 supports + cantilever (cantilever on the right)0.92.20.9 · 2.2
    Cantilever + 2 supports (cantilever on the left)2.20.92.2 · 0.9
    Cantilever + 2 supports + cantilever2.20.82.22.2 · 0.8 · 2.2
    Cantilever + 3 supports (cantilever on the left)2.20.70.82.2 · 0.7 · 0.8

    Note: the coefficient depends on the position: in a scheme of 4 supports — 0.8 in the two end spans, 0.6 in the middle span. Cantilever on the other side? The same coefficients in reverse order — like '2 supports + cantilever' versus 'cantilever + 2 supports'.

  3. 03

    A slab with two schemes — which one governs?

    Scheme 1: 3 supports, 4 + 4 m. Scheme 2: 2 supports + cantilever, 4.5 m + cantilever 1.5 m.

    • Scheme 1
      0.8 · 400 = 320 · 0.8 · 400 = 320 cm
    • Scheme 2
      0.9 · 450 = 405 · cantilever: 2.2 · 150 = 330 cm
    • Governs
      L0(max) = 405 cm — the 4.5 m span ✓

    That's it. A cantilever of a metre and a half is 'worth' 3.3 m — almost like the large span. So always check them all.

    Next: the thickness with L₀(max) = 405
    • Initial thicknessh0 = max(L0(max)25 , 15) = max(40525 , 15) = 17 cm
    • Self-weightS.w = 2.5 · h100 = 2.5 · 17100 = 0.425 t/m²
    • Service loadfser = S.w + Δg + q = 0.425 + 0.2 + 0.3 = 0.925 t/m²
    • Load coefficientK12 = 24.4∛(fser) = 24.4∛(0.925) = 25.04
    • Slab type coefficient — solid, one-way spanningK11 = 1
    • Aggregate and concrete coefficientK13 = 1
    • Required thicknesshreq = L0(max)K11 · K12 · K13 = 4051 · 25.04 · 1 = 16.17 cm
    • Thickness check (rounding up)hreq = 16.17 → 17 ≤ h = 17 cm ✓

    Rounding: 405 / 25 = 16.2 → round up: h₀ = 17.

  4. 04

    4 pitfalls

    • The coefficient of the wrong span. The coefficients in the table go in order from left to right — as in the drawing.
    • A cantilever with c = 1. A cantilever is always 2.2 — and it can set the thickness.
    • Taking L0 of the first scheme. What governs is L0(max) of the whole slab.
    • Metres and cm. In BST the spans are in cm — because h comes out in cm.

The full page — for BST PRO subscribers

The solved example, the pitfalls and the printable PDF — in the BST PRO binders.

Join PRO

Slabs binder · BST · beamsolvertool.com/en/learn/slabs/equivalent-span/

Solve a slab in BST BST identifies the scheme type and pulls the coefficient for every span

All pages as a print-ready PDF — in the Binders to download of BST PRO